Intuitive Analytics

Intuitive Analytics frees public finance analysts and decision makers from the limitations of available software.

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Browse by Tag

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Monte Carlo: Model, Method, or Nice Place to Visit?

  
  
  
  
  
  

"The first and most important thing to understand about Monte Carlo is that it is a numerical technique, not a model."

                   Ricardo RebonatoPlight of the Fortune Tellers

 If you ever hear people talking authoritatively about their powerful "Monte Carlo model," be very suspicious of the message and the messenger.  The Monte Carlo numerical method (in contrast to the lovely place on the French Riviera) is no more a "model" than addition is a "model" for ascertaining that two plus two equals four.  It is simply a way to perform certain calculations.  For any lingering Pythagoreans out there, Monte Carlo is specifically a very efficient way to calculate integrals in high dimensional spaces.  In finance, Markov chain Monte Carlo is used for generating estimated distributions for things like interest rates, equity prices, investment returns, and exchange rates.  People who think the Monte Carlo technique is a "model" are confused.  My hope is this quick post clears that up and convinces you the distinction is important.     

The simple fact of the matter is that once we face a situation that involves more than about three risk factors, Monte Carlo methods are the best we've got for calculating statistics of interest.  Modern homo sapiens, with our flat screen TVs, computers, multi-tasking cell phones, ipads, and big brains have simply not invented anything better than Monte Carlo to evaluate these types of problems.  And the more complicated the analysis, the more factors to analyze, and the better Monte Carlo does relative to other approaches.  Without getting bogged down in only mildly relevant detail, this is a direct result of Monte Carlo's uniquely wonderful properties in the face of the curse of dimensionality

So what?  Why should you care?  If you're like me, you hear people periodically either dismissing outright the utility of "Monte Carlo models," or alternatively gushing about how amazingly well their "Monte Carlo model" predicts the future.  When you hear this now you can rest comfortably in your understanding of the much more moderate truth: neither the naysayers nor the chest thumpers are in a position to properly use Monte Carlo to help make better financial decisions.  And properly used, Monte Carlo can absolutely help inform difficult financial decisions.  To that end, I leave you with a quote from Mr. Black Swan himself.

"The dividend of the computer revolution to us did not come in the flooding of self-perpetuating email messages and access to chat rooms; it was in the sudden availability of fast processors capable of generating a million sample paths per minute."

                                    Nassim TalebFooled by Randomness

Comments

So, theoretically speaking, would the advent of desktop quantum computers eliminate the need for such tools as Monte Carlo technique?
Posted @ Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:33 AM by Engineer
If or when practical, quantum computing would certainly open up the possibilities for using less efficient numerical techniques than Monte Carlo. But even then, the beauty of that much compute power is you could up the simulations to create as accurate a calculation as you like. Of course, accuracy when estimating the important deep tails of a distribution is often an exercise in tail chasing (pun intended)
Posted @ Thursday, April 22, 2010 4:26 AM by Peter Orr
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

*Various products, solutions, methodologies, processes and techniques presented and/or described on this website are proprietary to Intuitive Analytics LLC, and are multiple patents pending.